On separate page: Status Report, Sep. 2019
Origin: legends and hypotheses
According to 19th C. histories, the name Loban originated in the Inverness area, at Drumderfit about 1372, and tells that these Lobans were of the Clan MacLennan. (I found the image below and do not know its source, but it credits an earlier account.) This has resulted in the Lobans being accepted as a Sept of Clan MacLennan and using their tartan. At present the genetic connection between the MacLennans and Inverness Lobbans, if any, is unknown.
[In case you missed it elsewhere on this site, the spellings Loban and Lobban were used indiscriminately in the 17th and 18th Centuries, and only later did families settle on one spelling or the other. As the distribution data show, in the UK the great majority spell the name Lobban, but in Canada it is about half and half.]
George Fraser Black, in The Surnames of Scotland (1948), wrote:
“LOBAN. A Moray surname; a belt of a few miles along the Moray Firth it is said holds most of them. The name is explained as from Gaelic loban or lopan, and ‘was given to the progenitor, who is said to have been a Maclennan, from his having hidden under a peat-cart or sledge’ (Henderson, NI., p. 120). The date is about 1400. The legendary story of the origin of the name was first published by David Carey, the first editor of the Inverness Journal, in his novel Lochiel, or the Field of Culloden, London, 1820. Sir Charles Lowbane, a cleric, was witness to a submission anent the lands of Strathnarne, 1542 (Cawdor, p. 166), William Lobane in 1560 was tenant in Drumderfit (Macbain, Inverness names, p. 76), and John Loban was a tenant under the marquis of Huntlie, 1600 (SCM., IV, p. 288). Jonat Lobane and others were accused in 1614 of ‘crewel vnmerceifull murther’ in Inverness (Rec. Inv., II, p. 121), and Robert Lobein in Deir was charged in 1627 with being an ‘idle and masterless man’ (RPC.). George Lobban in Bodylair, parish of Glass, is mentioned, 1716 (SCM., IV, p. 168); John Lobon appears in Ternemnie, 1703 (Banff Rec., p. 244); and Elspat Lobban was the maiden name of the mother of James Fergusson, the astronomer. Alexander Lobban in Garland, parish of Dundurcas, 1773 (Moray), and John Lobban was member of Huntly Volunteers, 1798 (Will, p. 7).” [Black, p. 433]
and, under MacGhilleghuirm, ‘Son of the blue lad,’ “Gillegorm was a hero of the Maclennans, ancestor of the Lobans….” [Black, p. 496]
However, Sir Thomas Innes of Learney, late Lord Lyon in his The Tartans of the Clans and Families of Scotland (1952) thought there were two groups:
“William Lobane appears in 1564 as tenant in Drumderfit in the Black Isle, where the family were so long tenants that the local proverb says ‘as old as the Lobans of Drumderfit.’ . . . It seems more likely that the Morayshire and Banffshire Lobbans are of a different origin. ”
My late uncle, Alan Rudge (1933–2017), researched the Lobban/Loban name extensively and came to the same conclusion as the Lord Lyon: two groups, one centered in Banffshire being separate from the Inverness families (ms here). He drew the map reproduced below; note the locations of LOBAN 1 (“Inverness Lobans”) and LOBAN 2 (“NE Scotland Lobans”).
He further hypothesized that LOBAN 2 originated from a progenitor from France, who arrived in 1534 with the Abbott of Kinloss, that this man “Scottished” his name to Loban, and that his descendants settled in Banffshire and neighboring Elgin/Moray and Aberdeen. Malcolm Lobban (see his book, p. 11) adds to the potential continental European origin by noting the large number of Flemish people who settled in Scotland over a 600 year period and held positions of influence, including sovereigns of Scotland. The University of St. Andrews is actively researching the Flemish influence, which extended throughout our Northeast Scotland area. On the basis of a small amount of evidence, we have revised the hypothesis to propose that the founder was a Flemish immigrant, possibly in the early 1400s. The results of our first year of work testing these hypotheses are presented in the Status Report, Sep. 2019.
A map (below) compiling all the baptism and marriage records for Lobban in NE Scotland (in the case of marriages, only the groom), shows that there was a cluster of parishes centered on Rothiemay, Banffshire, where the name occurred during the period of extant Church of Scotland records (i.e., up to about 1850). The periods for which records exist vary from parish to parish, but of particular note is the missing Rothiemay records from 1711–1748, a time when there were many Lobans living in the parish. These missing records would greatly increase the number for Rothiemay. The descendants of this hypothetical ancestor spread into this region and multiplied, but then declined. Hence, I am also interested in the diaspora, particularly those who emigrated to England, Australia, Canada, and the USA.
We knew that it is unlikely that further written evidence about the proposed progenitor will be found, given the destruction of Catholic Church records after the Reformation. However, we realized that we might get evidence for some aspects of these hypotheses from study of Y-DNA, and we put out a call for Lobban males anywhere to contact us. We also actively sought DNA donors. For more on the Y-DNA project see the Y-DNA Project pages and the Progress Report, Sep. 2019.
Logan vs Loban
Several people have considered the relationship between Logans and Lobans in this part of Scotland. Of course, Logan is a widespread name with probably many origins. However, in the Drumderfit story (above) both names are mentioned in the same breath. Malcolm Lobban, in his 2008 book, The Scottish Surname LOBBAN, has summarized the evidence, including that in Major G.J.N. Logan Home’s book on the genealogy of the Drumderfit Logans, and concluded that Loban might actually be the earlier name. There are examples of this orthographic switch in the family records mentioned in this web site (e.g., South African Logan line), and it may have been widespread in the centuries before records. Malcolm’s chapter is available here (download pdf) [or get the entire book here].
[Sidebar 1] Surnames and climate change
As an interesting aside, Wayne Shepheard published an essay in the Journal of One-Name Studies, 13 (4), Oct-Dec 2018*, proposing that surnames came into widespread use as a result of the sudden drop in temperatures and increased storminess near the end of the 13th C., when the Medieval Warm Period in Europe disappeared into the harsh Little Ice Age (approx 1300–1850), with major consequences for agriculture. New social welfare programs were necessary to help the destitute, and these in turn likely spurred the adoption of surnames (already underway) so that government and churches could better identify people on tax and welfare rolls. The history of Drumderfit begins not long into this period, when surnames were perhaps still rather fluid.
*Viewable online by logged-in ONS members at https://one-name.org/members/journal/pdfs/vol13-4.pdf. Besides the references in this article, there are two relevant articles in Scottish Geographical Journal, Wittington 1985 and Dodgshon 2005 (full text) . The latter mentions the most severe phase, the Maunder Minimum, about 1645–1715.
[Sidebar 2] A note on first names in historical times.
I picked this information off the Jam?son Family Network site. and it is very helpful in explaining why there are so many Alexander, John, James and William Lobbans; I reproduce it verbatim:
During the 1600’s and through the 1800’s, many cultures followed the custom of naming their children in a specific manner, generation after generation. This was especially true to those people in the British Isles, Scotland, Ireland, England and Wales. This practice remained pretty much in tact as families began emigrating throughout the world, certainly among the Ulster Scots and the early settlers in Colonial America. This is, no doubt, why so many identical or similar names appear generation after generation within the same family. This practice continued, even as middle names became more common, beginning about the early 1800’s, but waned somewhat by the middle or latter 1800’s as cultures intermixed and traditions diminished. Although still used by some families, naming patterns and traditions seem no longer as widespread, or at least far less so.
The most common ‘old’ method seems to be as follows:
- Eldest son – named after his paternal grandfather
- Second son – after his maternal grandfather
- Third son – after his father
- Fourth son – after his father’s eldest brother
- Eldest daughter – after her maternal grandmother
- Second daughter – after her paternal grandmother
- Third daughter – after her mother
- Fourth daughter – after her mother’s eldest sister
Sometimes the order is reversed — the eldest son is named after his maternal grandfather, etc.
Page by Christopher S. Lobban, posted 13 July 2019, last edited 30 July 2019.